Aussie Pride

This post builds a bit on the last one. I’m not sure if it’s just that I’m paying more attention during this trip, but compared to any other country I’ve ever visited, Australian nativism seems to be a bigger deal here than anywhere else. What I mean is this: “Australian made” is stamped on everything that it could be possibly stamped on. It’s on food, on consumer goods, on cars, everything. It’s most obvious on food, and most ridiculous too.

The picture below sums it up–Kraft is certainly not an Australian brand and this shouldn’t be fooling anyone. But someone thinks it’s a good idea to put “100% Aussie Peanuts” on the jar. They must think they’re appealing to someone.

100% Aussie Peanuts

IMG_0304

This seems to be something different than the locavore movement in the US or the regionalist cuisine movement everywhere else. In France, for example, no one cares that the butter is French specifically, what matters is the region. At our local supermarket in Ithaca even, “Grown in the USA” is becoming less important than “locally sourced.” I’ve heard that people can get pretty excited about Korean rice and beef in Korea or Japanese whatever in Japan, but even there regional origins seem more important. In Australia, from what we’ve seen (and wine is the exception), the main issue is simply whether or not the food is made in Australia or not. We haven’t seen “Queensland pineapples” or “Tasmanian lamb.”

Perhaps we’re just not looking in the right places. I wonder what this is all about.

Posted in Food and Drink
4 comments on “Aussie Pride
  1. Sandy says:

    If you have to ask, the answer is always money.

  2. Matt says:

    You might be over-thinking this. Given that Kraft is unambiguously a foreign-import, isn’t the marginal-cost of putting the “Made in the AUS” label on there worth it, even if it only activates a small number of people to buy the product who otherwise wouldn’t?

    I also think you’re vastly underestimating the power of “Made in the USA” labeling here in America. I would guess that for every person who actively weight “locally grown” in their consumer choices, there are 100 who weight “made in the usa.”

    We were out looking at cars (er,…mini-vans) yesterday, and I was at the Honda dealership. The “fact-sheet” in the window of every new car includes detailed information, in pretty big font, about how much of the Honda was actually made in the United States, what percentage of the parts were made here, etc. I know cars are different that peanut butter, but that strikes me as just about the same thing: an obviously foreign product (at least in the sense that the return on capital profits generally head out of the country) trumpeting that it’s ingredients are domestic.

    BTW, did you see the U.S.-Brazil soccer game today? unreal.

  3. TP says:

    @Mom: of course, but if money always matters (is a constant) then it can’t explain why some places differ (variation)

    @Matt: oh I totally agree…what was lost in my post is that I think that *except for the US* I’ve never seen anywhere where “Made in Country X” is so important. So the USA and Australia are similar, and differ from everywhere else. The point about the marginal cost of putting “Aussie Peanuts” on the packaging is spot on, but (just guessing) I don’t think that anyone in Germany is putting “German pork” on their sausages. They are putting “Munich pork” or whatever.

    Saw highlights of the game, but looked incredible. Makes me wish I had a daughter so I could get her fired up about sports.

  4. Matt says:

    Anna and I were watching the soccer game together, and she had what I perceive to be her first moment of being a fan. I was in the kitchen making us a snack when the U.S. scored at the 2-minute mark, and all I hear from the family room is:

    OHHHH….OHHHH….DAAAAADYYYYYY….GOOOOOAAALLLLLLL!!!!!!!

    I can’t attribute it to nationalism or even rooting for a team — we hadn’t even discussed yet which “color team” she liked better. But it did tell me something about soccer: the combination of the game being easy for a 3 year old to understand (it’s the only team sport Anna unambiguously understands the objective of) plus the rarity of the goals is going to hook kids faster than, say, baseball. That’s for sure.

    The constant overlaid digital scoreboard on a modern tv is also great; I got back to the family room and Anna said, “Look Daddy, look — it’s one to zero!”

Comments are closed.

On Twitter
Categories
Archives
%d bloggers like this: