Category: Politics

  • Subsidies that Work; or, Why is Good Food So Cheap in Germany and Expensive in Australia?

    Two summers ago we traveled as a family to Australia, where we were based in Canberra for five weeks. This month we are in Germany, based in Freiburg. We love to travel, but since having kids, we’ve noticed that travel has become a lot more expensive. Nothing illustrates this more than our grocery bill.

    At least, that’s what we’ve come to expect. Here in Freiburg, we have been floored at how inexpensive our food bill has been. Some illustrations:

    1. We always have to stock a kitchen when we arrive in a new town. In Canberra, it cost us AUD245 in June 2011. In Freiburg in June 2013, our bill was EUR62. This is the case even though we also have one more kid this time, and little AP’s diet is pretty strict (and her favorite food, avocados, is hardly a local product).
    2. One Starbucks breakfast in Sydney cost us AUD28: that’s one tea, one long black, one yogurt, and three pastries. Our dinner last night at Hausbrauerei Feierling cost us EUR23: that’s one large fresh organic beer, one fresh-pressed organic apple cider, one bitter lemon, one large fresh soft pretzel, a basket of very good bread, two Landjäger, two Weißwürste, two Bauernwürste, and a salad. This is at a biergarten, yes, but it’s the most touristy one in Freiburg and the food was very good.

    Now in U.S. dollar terms, some of the comparisons might be overstating things. The $ / AUD exchange rate was about 1.2/1 in 2011, which was as bad as it’s been. The $ / EUR exchange rate right now is around 1.3/1, which is great by recent standards. Also, when it comes to stocking our kitchen, we had to be more aggressive in Canberra because we couldn’t walk to the Supabarn, whereas we can walk to the Rewe in about 7 minutes.

    But those differences don’t begin to explain the stark differences in the price of food between Freiburg and Canberra. Moreover, these inexpensive foods that we’re buying here in Freiburg are tasty and nutritious. If you don’t believe me, take a look at this fried egg, which is just a normal organic cage free egg from the grocery store. 10 of these cost EUR1!

    Deep orange yolk = extra delicious

    Subsidies in the U.S. seem to be producing huge amounts of grains, leading to a superabundance of white flour, corn syrup, and corn-fed beef. Here, they seem to be producing nutritious, locally-grown, organic vegetables, tasty dairy, cage free poultry, and free range meat.

    I see two questions here. One is why food is so expensive in Australia but so cheap here. One might think it’s just about subsidies—Australian farm subsidies appear to be very low—but don’t forget that Australia is a big sunny country with no one living in it, and (especially in Queensland) the land is incredibly fertile. Even with low subsidies, and a center which is useless for commercial agriculture, Australia is a net agricultural exporter. Agricultural subsidies in Germany are a big deal, and farmers are very powerful, yet this does not translate into either higher food prices or an abundance of lousy and unhealthy food.

    Which leads us to the second question: why, given the extensive subsidies to German farmers, does this not translate into industrial farms producing bland and unhealthy corn/wheat/soy by the kiloton? The most productive farm areas of Germany would produce approximately the same types of crops as would the most productive farm areas of the U.S. Yet farmers are growing a wide range of healthy, natural foods, and for the same price.

    I’ve asked around a bit, and I have some hypotheses. But none seem satisfactory.

    1. The “Freiburg” Effect. It’s possible that our experience is not a German experience, it’s a Freiburg experience. Freiburg is a very environmental town, and numerous people have explained to us that French culinary traditions shape Freiburgers’ approach to food. Maybe if we were elsewhere in Germany, we’d see fresh produce, dairy, and meats with the high prices that we expect. It’s possible that this is true, as neither JMP nor I have been anywhere else in Germany than Freiburg. But we doubt it: Germany is a capitalist economy with incredibly functional domestic transportation system, so it’d be hard to imagine that prices would differ that much in one city because competition would tend to equalize them. (Also, Freiburg is very close to France, so it should also experience competition from there as well.) This would probably only work as an explanation if the premium on local agriculture elsewhere were so high as to make it impossible to sell Freiburg’s local agricultural products elsewhere at nearly any price.
    2. EU Agricultural Subsidies. It’s also possible that EU agricultural subsidies just really work well, and that the low prices for food are just the consequence of high taxes, which we as tourists don’t see. Could be, but that doesn’t seem quite right, for one reason. German agricultural policy is made in Brussels, and we’ve been elsewhere in Europe (France, Italy, the UK) around this time of year, and seen tasty and nutritious food, but the prices were much higher prices.
    3. Farm size. One economist explained to me that German farms in what was formerly West Germany tend to be small. This creates stiff price competition, and inhibits mass production of cheap grain on an industrial scale. The former seems exactly wrong to me: small farms should be less cost-efficient, on average, than large ones. But there is perhaps something to the second argument. One piece of evidence in favor of this argument might lie in the large farms in the former East Germany, which are large as a legacy of collectivization under the GDR. Perhaps they act more like U.S.-style industrial farms, leaving the smaller farms in the former West producing other types of agricultural products that just happen to be better. But still, this does not explain why oranges (from Spain) and avocados (from Peru) are still so inexpensive.

    In all, we’re stumped. But happily so: eating well and feeling healthy without breaking the bank. And it makes me wonder how agricultural subsidies here are working so well, given their incredibly distortionary effects on food production in the U.S.

    UPDATE:
    An old friend who is also both German and an economist writes the following:

    The low price of groceries compared to really anywhere else always puzzled me, too. Even Switzerland and England are very different. Compared to the US, it’s especially striking since basically everything else is cheaper in the US. The comparison to Switzerland is the most baffling, since Switzerland has free trade with the EU. No trade economist I asked had a good explanation…What people in Germany often say is that retailing is very concentrated. But why is this market power only used to push upstream prices down, and not also used to push up retail prices? Again, I haven’t seen a good explanation or model for this…

  • SEAREG 2013 Rundown

    Just three months ago, I announced the formation of the Southeast Asia Research Group. I’m happy to report that our inaugural meeting was held at Duke on May 24-25. By all accounts it was a smashing success, in terms of intellectual exchange, focused discussion of interesting new research, networking, and building a community of Southeast Asianists in political science and related fields.

    (On a personal level, I recall a passing remark about 8 months ago about how I wished that there was version of IPES or AALIMS for Southeast Asian politics. SEAREG is exactly that—although closer in format to AALIMS than to IPES—and it is great.)

    One broad conclusion from the discussions, and in particular from the opening remarks by our local host and convener Eddy Malesky and the keynote address by Rick Doner, is that this is a truly exciting time for social scientists working in Southeast Asia. Many of the most significant disciplinary trends in political science and economics are consistent with the type of careful data collection and careful attention to theory, history, and context that come from having a strong area background alongside the standard disciplinary training. Doing Southeast Asia as a political scientist may even become rather mainstream.

    I’m also happy to report that we are just getting started. We have secured partial funding for at least one more conference, tentatively scheduled for May 3-4, 2014 at Cornell. Watch this space and seareg.org for further updates about SEAREG 2014, and especially for information our next class of Southeast Asia Fellows.

    Graduate students, post-docs, and new assistant professors: we especially hope that you will take note and attend, as you represent our main constituency. Contact us if you want more information.